Opportunity

NHS Advice-and-Guidance Safety Tracking & Escalation Layer

NHS advice-and-guidance pathways are expanding, but HSSIB has identified cases where poorly designed or monitored pathways contributed to delayed diagnosis, serious harm and patient deaths.

NHSHealthTechHealth & SafetyData & AnalyticsB2B SaaSPublic SectorUnited KingdomUnderserved score 86/100Published Aug 19, 2026

Decision snapshot

Primary user
NHS trusts, ICBs and primary/secondary care teams operating advice-and-guidance or single-point-of-access pathways, particularly high-risk specialties such as cancer.
Likely buyer
Likely buyers are trust digital, patient-safety, planned-care and ICB transformation leaders. Users need a safety overlay that works with e-RS rather than another competing national referral system.
Why now
A&G is being embedded into national planning and GP contracts, while HSSIB is explicitly asking for better evaluation before further expansion.
Initial wedge
A safety-monitoring and escalation layer that sits alongside e-RS/A&G workflows, detects pathway exceptions and gives trusts evidence about where patients are being delayed or lost.
Key uncertainty
Raise the score if trusts cannot currently measure unresolved A&G pathway risk and a pilot identifies preventable exceptions. Lower it if e-RS enhancements deliver equivalent safety monitoring nationally.

The problem

NHS advice-and-guidance pathways are expanding, but HSSIB has identified cases where poorly designed or monitored pathways contributed to delayed diagnosis, serious harm and patient deaths.

Operational consequences

When responsibility moves between primary and secondary care, unanswered advice, converted referrals, rejected requests and follow-up actions can become safety-critical. Existing referral systems do not guarantee that local organisations can see pathway-level risk or reliably escalate exceptions.

Who is underserved

NHS trusts, ICBs and primary/secondary care teams operating advice-and-guidance or single-point-of-access pathways, particularly high-risk specialties such as cancer.

Buyer and user context

Likely buyers are trust digital, patient-safety, planned-care and ICB transformation leaders. Users need a safety overlay that works with e-RS rather than another competing national referral system.

Evidence

HSSIB says A&G can benefit patients but warned that poorly designed or monitored pathways can create dangerous delays. NHS England is simultaneously expanding e-RS-based A&G, making monitoring a live implementation requirement.

Evidence interpretation

This is a safety-governance opportunity rather than a referral-routing opportunity: detect when advice is unanswered, repeatedly redirected, converted incorrectly or leaves a patient without a clear accountable next step.

Demand

A&G is being embedded into national planning and GP contracts, while HSSIB is explicitly asking for better evaluation before further expansion.

Validation approach

Pilot in one trust/ICB across one high-risk specialty. Track unanswered requests, time-to-specialist response, converted referrals, patient follow-up, safety incidents and pathway leakage against an existing baseline.

Competition

NHS e-RS is the national platform and commercial products such as Consultant Connect, SMART Referrals, RIVIAM, Scribe and Patient Pass already improve referral management.

Potential defensibility

Defensibility requires safety analytics and cross-pathway audit rather than intake/routing: configurable safety rules, patient-level continuity, incident linkage and an evidence pack for trust/ICB governance. Integration with e-RS is essential.

The opportunity

A safety-monitoring and escalation layer that sits alongside e-RS/A&G workflows, detects pathway exceptions and gives trusts evidence about where patients are being delayed or lost.

Intended outcome

Allow A&G expansion without making safety risk invisible, and give clinical/governance teams a measurable way to evaluate pathway performance.

Commercial model

Pricing classification

Directly evidenced — medium confidence.

Indicative pricing

- Paid test offer: Paid service or employer pilot: £10,000–£25,000 Proof-of-concept £10,000–£30,000; recurring £15,000–£60,000/year per trust/ICB depending on specialties and integrations. G-Cloud referral benchmarks include Patient Pass £5,000–£15,000/licence/year, Scribe £15,000–£25,000/licence/year and RIVIAM core referral management from £3,250/month.

Evidence basis: Patient Pass (£5,000–£15,000 per licence per year) is the closest verified direct anchor used here. Its buyer, duration and scope are not assumed to be identical; implementation is separated where the opportunity requires integration, assurance or managed delivery.

Commercial test

Ask one accountable NHS, council, employer, school-system or care-service budget owner to fund a paid test of NHS Advice-and-Guidance Safety Tracking & Escalation Layer lasting 8–12 weeks, using an opening price of £10,000–£25,000 and covering two operational teams and 50 representative referrals, cases or employees. Paid scope: A safety-monitoring and escalation layer that sits alongside e-RS/A&G workflows, detects pathway exceptions and gives trusts evidence about where patients are being delayed or lost. Charge by service, organisation, enrolled person or managed cohort and compare the fee with current referral, case-coordination, absence-management and specialist-support effort. Measure time to action, safe escalation, case completion, avoidable hand-offs, staff hours and sustained return/retention. Continue only if time to appropriate action improves by at least 20%, no safety escalation is missed and the budget owner elects to continue. Stop or reprice if clinical or safeguarding quality falls, coordination effort rises or the buyer will not fund the next cohort.

Monetisation models and pricing estimates are research-informed and indicative only. Where direct pricing evidence is unavailable, estimates may use comparable products, procurement data, adjacent market benchmarks and stated assumptions. They are not financial advice, forecasts or guarantees of commercial viability. Independent market, legal and financial validation is recommended before acting.

Score rationale

Underserved score 86/100

The originating safety signal is unusually strong: HSSIB links poor pathway implementation to serious harm while national policy is increasing usage. Existing products prove budget but also create competition; a safety-specific overlay is the clearest wedge.

What would change the score

Raise the score if trusts cannot currently measure unresolved A&G pathway risk and a pilot identifies preventable exceptions. Lower it if e-RS enhancements deliver equivalent safety monitoring nationally.

The score is evidence-informed editorial judgement based on manually reviewed sources. It is not a forecast or guarantee. How we score →

Evidence sources8

  1. Consultant Connect — e-RS Connect

    consultantconnect.org.uk

  2. G-Cloud — Patient Pass pricing

    applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk

  3. G-Cloud — Scribe Referral Management pricing

    applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk

  4. G-Cloud — RIVIAM referral management pricing

    assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk

Some evidence sources may require an account or sign-in to view the original content.